I don't know if this is only my issue, but the learning and judging through context menu is extremely slow. For example, some mails get a tag with 0,009 points, that is nonsense. AutoBucket should tag only when the tag is clearly to be applied. Right now, _all_ mails get a tag from AutoBucket (except those already tagged by the filters), but often the mails should not get a tag. No points boundary: It would be very useful to be able to set a bounday below which no tag would be applied. It would be useful for the learning that AutoBucket would learn from the tags applied by the filters. I like that, but maybe this could also be user defined. Another issue seems to be that AutoBucket only applies to mails which did not get any tag from the filters. It would be useful, for example, to be able to use the tags of AutoBucket to filter the mails. In my case, it would be useful that AutoBucket would apply before the filters, or that you could choose if after or before. As a result, in the IMAP inbox the tags are applied, but only after my filters have copied the mails to the local folders. I really like this extension, but I think it could get much better, here some proposals: - Interaction with filters: AutoBucket seems to tag my mails _after_ my filters are applied. 17 years later, I still find myself in email-stoneage, and all I can find is unintuitive, half-ready ****, that is no fun at all. The classification-file was just a text-file where you could check for each folder, which keywords were created by the system. In the beginning, a lot mails ended up in all folders, but by drag-and-drop you were able to train the classification easily.

When now an email was dragged into a folder, it learned with simple ham-spam-like classification if a mail fit there or not. The M2 client had a 'simple' technique: For each folder you created, you could tick 'learn from email'. I enjoyed the built-in M2 Email client of the Opera browser from 2004 to 2013 till they finally dropped support for Linux and all went down the drain. This said, I wonder why it seems to be so incredibly challenging to introduce such functionality. Actually, there is nothing dumber than standard techniques like manually setting filters. First of all: I appreciate any attempt to make email classification more 'smart'.

Thunderbird vs opera mail