I took it to check out to ask if they can give me the online price and they insisted no that’s online you have to do this online even though I was right there in the store. I looked online and it was $60 for a pretty good microwave, I went to the store and it was $100. A few months ago, I look online for a few weeks for a microwave and Walmart ended up being the place that I got it. This is probably the reason why the canning jars were not priced priced. When u get to the register, it’s double price as other store. The canning jars are actually marked up higher than other stores. I just went in there yesterday, I took pictures because none of the canning jars had prices, tags, nothing.

I am a constant victim of Walmart and this practice and others. She also wants damages on behalf of herself and all consumers allegedly injured by Walmart’s conduct. She seeks for Walmart to be required to disgorge all profits gained from wrongfully representing prices to entice consumers into making purchases. Maynez seeks damages on behalf of herself and all other similarly affected consumers around the country who, in the last four years, used Walmart’s e-commerce app, found a quoted price, and then purchased the same item at a store for a price higher than that advertised on the app at the time of their purchase.Īdditionally, she hopes to represent an Injunctive Relief Class of those consumers who saw a price on the app, but were offered the item at a higher price in-store, even if they did not purchase the item. The plaintiff states that this practice violates California law including the Unfair Competition Law, the Consumer Legal Remedies Act, and the False Advertising Law. The Walmart class action says the retail giant makes a widespread practice of misrepresenting prices on its app. According to Maynez, she paid $29.97 more for the two items in-store than she would have if they were sold for the prices offered on the Walmart app.

Walmart instock checker